Dissenting opinions in court, often articulated by minority justices, significantly impact legal interpretation and future rulings. They provide a critical perspective that may highlight constitutional ambiguities or challenge majority views. Such opinions can inform future cases, contribute to legal discourse, and occasionally prompt legislative reforms by illustrating societal concerns. Moreover, dissenting opinions can influence public opinion and advocacy efforts, leading to shifts in how laws are understood and applied. This interplay between majority and dissent shapes the evolution of jurisprudence.